Pic 2: the bad news is that the keyboard is small. So, if I were to buy one, I'd probably get a case for it. I don't think a case would benefit the Go although the keyboard would be loose as there is no strap or magnet keeping it shut. It folds up nice and I normally have a UAG case on my 3. Pic 1: the Go is smaller but does not feel out of place. I will elaborate on each picture as well. Here are some pictures and my brief experience with the Go. Couldn't really go into the meat of the Go but I was not concerned with that today. While its Pentium and i3 options are not ideal for all of these tasks (Alder Lake Y should help considerably in this area for future Go models), they still allow the Go 3 to go unrivaled as far as productivity is concerned in its form factor - which is exactly what sets it apart from the competition.So, I went to Worst Buy today to take some pictures and "test" out the keyboard as well as the size. You can plug just about anything into it (external drive, network cable, dock, display, printer, camera, scanner, legacy equipment, etc.) and it can run essentially any software (virtual machines, development tools, CAD programs, image/video/audio editors, scientific tools, games, etc.).
As I stated with the Surface Pro 8, the Go 3 can do just about anything that its hardware will allow it to do. The author doesn't even bother to properly address software in the article and just goes by the assumption that "Windows = bad, iPadOS = good". These Surface vs iPad articles are extremely low effort and riddled with errors (some examples: the author uses the i3-10100 as a sub in for the i3-10100Y, they don't mention that the Surface Go 3 has microSDXC, etc.). The author appears to know very little about Surface devices and probably just took a glance at the spec sheet (and not a very long one at that).Īgain, at the end of the day, the Surface Go 3 is a full x86 based Windows 11 device. That specification table… did anyone bother to proof the format/structure once it was published?
0 kommentar(er)
